1. Socio-Cultural Setting of the Neo-Classical Age (based on two texts)
The Neo-Classical Age (1660–1798), also called the Age of Reason or the Augustan Age, was marked by a deep faith in rationalism, decorum, social order, and classical restraint. It arose in the aftermath of the Restoration, following years of civil war and Puritan austerity. Society now celebrated urban wit, political satire, coffeehouse culture, and journalistic discourse, reflecting a growing middle class and a rational, skeptical worldview.
Two representative texts—Alexander Pope’s The Rape of the Lock (1712) and Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726)—capture this socio-cultural ethos vividly.
Pope’s The Rape of the Lock mirrors the aristocratic obsession with manners, fashion, and social reputation in 18th-century England. By transforming a trivial quarrel into a mock-epic, Pope exposes how the age’s preoccupation with surface elegance masks moral shallowness. His “Belinda” becomes an emblem of a society where vanity and etiquette replace virtue and depth. This reflects the materialistic and appearance-driven social elite of Queen Anne’s reign.
Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels, in contrast, extends social satire to a global and philosophical level, revealing the irrationality beneath human reason. Through the Lilliputians’ pettiness and the Houyhnhnms’ sterile rationalism, Swift critiques the pretentious rationalism and moral corruption of his age. He reveals a society that prizes reason but loses humanity—capturing the contradictions of Enlightenment culture.
Together, these works dramatize how reason and refinement coexist with vanity and hypocrisy, illustrating the social paradox at the heart of the Neo-Classical worldview.
2. The Most Successful Literary Form in Capturing the Zeitgeist: Satire
Among the dominant forms—satire, the novel, and non-fictional prose—satire most successfully captured the zeitgeist of the Neo-Classical period.
The age was one of moral didacticism, rational inquiry, and social commentary, and satire, by its very nature, was the perfect vehicle for exposing folly through wit and reason. Writers like Dryden, Pope, and Swift wielded satire as a tool of moral correction, blending classical restraint with biting humor.
Dryden’s Absalom and Achitophel (1681) translates political factionalism into biblical allegory, mocking the ambitions and hypocrisies of Restoration politicians.
Pope’s The Dunciad (1728) ridicules the decline of literary taste and the commercialization of culture in Grub Street.
Swift’s A Modest Proposal (1729), with its shocking irony, exposes the inhumanity of British policies toward Ireland.
Unlike the early novel or the periodical essay—which often appealed to middle-class sensibility—satire spoke to both elite and popular audiences, shaping public discourse and moral consciousness. It mirrored the age’s intellectual pride, moral anxiety, and political irony better than any other form.
Thus, satire was not only a mode of literary expression but a cultural barometer of Neo-Classical England.
3. Development of Drama in the Neo-Classical Age: Sentimental and Anti-Sentimental Comedy
After the Restoration’s bawdy comedies, 18th-century drama turned toward moral seriousness and emotional refinement, giving rise to Sentimental Comedy.
Sentimental Comedy (e.g., Richard Steele’s The Conscious Lovers, 1722) replaced wit and sexual intrigue with virtue, pathos, and moral instruction. Characters were drawn as models of goodness rather than vice, appealing to the middle-class ideals of sensibility and domestic virtue. These plays sought to make audiences “cry rather than laugh,” emphasizing moral reform and sympathy over satire.
However, this moral earnestness soon provoked reaction.
Anti-Sentimental Comedy, led by playwrights like Oliver Goldsmith and Richard Brinsley Sheridan, restored laughter and realism to the stage.
Goldsmith’s She Stoops to Conquer (1773) revived comedy of manners with natural humor and social observation.
Sheridan’s The Rivals (1775) and The School for Scandal (1777) blended wit, satire, and moral insight, critiquing hypocrisy without losing delight.
Thus, Neo-Classical drama evolved from didactic sentimentalism to balanced comic realism, embodying the period’s oscillation between moral idealism and social wit.
4. Contribution of Richard Steele and Joseph Addison
Richard Steele and Joseph Addison, through their pioneering work in the periodical essay, transformed 18th-century prose and shaped modern journalism.
Together, they founded The Tatler (1709) and The Spectator (1711), aiming to “enliven morality with wit, and to temper wit with morality.”
Addison contributed graceful, reflective essays that cultivated taste and manners.
Steele wrote with warmth and moral earnestness, focusing on daily life, conduct, and virtue.
Their essays popularized rational conversation, politeness, and domestic virtue, mirroring the values of the emerging middle class. They used humor and reason to reform social manners, especially among the urban elite and women readers.
Addison’s essays on taste, imagination, and criticism helped found modern aesthetics, while Steele’s focus on sentiment and morality laid the groundwork for the sentimental novel and comedy.
Together, they democratized literature—transforming coffeehouses into cultural academies and the essay into a medium of social instruction and intellectual delight.
Conclusion
The Neo-Classical Age represents a dynamic dialogue between reason and emotion, wit and virtue, satire and sentiment.
Through works like Pope’s mock-epics, Swift’s political irony, Addison and Steele’s moral essays, and Goldsmith’s comedies, the period forged a distinct literary identity grounded in classical balance and modern consciousness.
It was an age that believed literature could civilize taste, reform manners, and instruct through delight—a conviction that still echoes in the foundations of modern literary culture.
Comments
Post a Comment