Colonial Power, Racial Division, Resistance, and Decolonization

 

Violence and Manichaeism in Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth

Understanding Colonial Oppression and the Struggle for Decolonization

Introduction

Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (Les Damnés de la Terre, 1961) is one of the most influential texts of anti-colonial and postcolonial thought. Written in the context of the Algerian struggle against French colonial rule, the book examines colonialism not simply as a political system but as a structure that affects the social, psychological, cultural, and economic life of the colonized.

Two important concepts in Fanon’s first chapter, “On Violence,” are violence and Manichaeism. Fanon argues that colonialism itself is established and maintained through violence. At the same time, colonial society is organized according to a rigid binary opposition between the colonizer and the colonized, which Fanon describes as a “Manichaean world.”

Therefore, to understand Fanon, violence should not be considered only as physical conflict. It is also connected with the political, racial, cultural, and psychological structures of colonial domination.

---

1. What Is the Role of Violence in Colonialism with Reference to The Wretched of the Earth?

Colonialism as a System of Violence

For Fanon, violence is not an accidental feature of colonialism. It is one of the foundations upon which the colonial system is constructed. Colonial powers occupy territories, control resources, establish political authority, and impose their institutions through force.

Fanon famously begins his discussion of decolonization by arguing that:

“Decolonization is always a violent phenomenon.”

This statement should be understood within Fanon’s description of the colonial system. The colonial world is divided between the settler and the native, and this division is maintained through institutions such as the army, police, prisons, and other mechanisms of coercion.

The colonial government does not merely govern the colonized through laws. It makes its authority physically visible through military and police power. Fanon therefore describes the colonial world as a world divided into separate zones, with the colonizer possessing privilege, security, and political power while the colonized are subjected to restrictions and surveillance.

Violence and the Creation of the Colonial Subject

Colonial violence affects more than the body. It also affects the mind.

The colonizer repeatedly represents the colonized as inferior, uncivilized, irrational, dangerous, or incapable of governing themselves. Through this process, colonialism attempts to create a psychological condition of inferiority among the colonized.

Thus, colonial violence operates at several levels:

• Physical violence through military and police force.
• Political violence through the denial of self-government.
• Economic violence through exploitation of land, labour, and resources.
• Cultural violence through the devaluation of indigenous traditions and knowledge.
• Psychological violence through racism and the production of feelings of inferiority.

Fanon's argument is therefore much broader than the idea that colonialism simply uses weapons. Colonial domination restructures the entire society.

Why Does Fanon Connect Violence with Decolonization?

Fanon argues that because colonialism itself is established through force, the colonized experience liberation as a confrontation with that structure.

The colonized person does not simply ask the colonizer to change a few laws. The entire colonial relationship must be transformed. Decolonization therefore involves a fundamental restructuring of political and social power.

Violence, in this sense, becomes connected with the process through which the colonized reject the colonial order and reclaim political agency.

Fanon also believes that participation in resistance can transform the psychology of the colonized. A person who has been taught to regard themselves as powerless can begin to experience themselves as an active historical subject through collective struggle.

Violence as Psychological Transformation

One of Fanon’s important insights is that resistance has a psychological dimension.

Colonialism attempts to convince the colonized that they are weak and dependent. Anti-colonial resistance can challenge this condition. The struggle creates solidarity and a sense of collective identity.

The colonized person moves from being an object of colonial history to becoming a participant in making history.

This does not mean that Fanon presents violence simply as an abstract moral ideal. Rather, his argument emerges from his analysis of a colonial situation in which violence has already structured the relationship between colonizer and colonized.

Violence and the Destruction of the Colonial Structure

For Fanon, decolonization is not merely the replacement of one government with another. It involves dismantling the colonial system itself.

The colonial world is spatially and socially divided: European and native quarters, European and native institutions, privileged and marginalized populations. The liberation struggle therefore aims to break this colonial structure and establish a new social and political order.

Violence becomes significant because the colonial system does not voluntarily surrender its structures of power.

In short:

Colonialism → domination through force → psychological and social oppression → resistance → decolonization

Fanon's discussion of violence is therefore fundamentally connected with the unequal structure of colonial society.

---

2. What Does Manichaeism Mean in a Colonial Context?

The Meaning of Manichaeism

The term Manichaeism originally refers to an ancient religious tradition associated with a sharp opposition between light and darkness, or good and evil.

Fanon adopts this concept metaphorically to describe the organization of colonial society.

He writes that:

“The colonial world is a Manichaean world.”

By this, Fanon means that colonialism creates a rigid binary division between two groups:

Colonizer / Colonized
White / Black
European / Native
Civilized / “Primitive”
Good / Evil
Human / Dehumanized

The colonizer places themselves on the side of civilization, morality, reason, and humanity, while representing the colonized as their opposite.

The Colonial World “Cut in Two”

Fanon repeatedly describes the colonial world as divided into two separate zones.

The colonizer possesses political power, economic privilege, and social authority. The colonized inhabit a different social and geographical space and are controlled by the institutions of colonial authority.

This division is not simply geographical. It is ideological.

The colonizer creates an image of the colonized as inferior. Indigenous culture, customs, religion, and social practices are frequently represented as evidence of backwardness.

Consequently, colonialism does not merely occupy territory; it also creates a system of meanings through which colonial domination appears legitimate.

The Colonized as “Absolute Evil”

One of the most important aspects of Fanon’s Manichaeism is the representation of the colonized as morally inferior.

The colonizer does not merely say that the colonized have a different culture. Instead, the colonial ideology can portray the colonized as lacking morality, reason, civilization, and even full humanity.

This representation makes domination easier to justify.

If the colonized are represented as incapable of governing themselves, colonial rule can be presented as a supposed “civilizing mission.”

Fanon exposes this logic as part of colonial domination.

Manichaeism and Racism

Manichaeism is therefore closely connected to racism.

The binary structure of colonial society converts differences between people into a hierarchy. Skin colour, origin, culture, and social identity become associated with assumptions about intelligence, morality, civilization, and worth.

The result is not simply:

“We are different from them.”

Instead, colonial ideology produces:

“We are superior to them.”

This distinction is crucial.

Fanon's criticism is directed at the way colonialism transforms cultural difference into a justification for domination.

Manichaeism and Dehumanization

The Manichaean structure also dehumanizes the colonized.

When one group is consistently represented as inferior or dangerous, violence against that group can become easier to justify. The colonized are not treated as equal human subjects but as objects of administration, control, punishment, and exploitation.

This is why Fanon's discussion of Manichaeism is closely connected with his discussion of violence.

Ideological division helps justify colonial violence, while colonial violence reinforces the ideological division.

Thus, the two concepts cannot be completely separated.

---

Violence and Manichaeism: The Connection

Fanon's concepts of violence and Manichaeism ultimately describe two interconnected dimensions of colonialism.

Manichaeism explains the ideological structure of colonialism, while violence explains the material and coercive structure through which that ideology is maintained.

Manichaeism	Violence
Divides colonizer and colonized	Enforces colonial domination
Creates racial hierarchy	Maintains political control
Represents colonized as inferior	Controls colonized through force
Dehumanizes the colonized	Makes exploitation possible
Provides ideological justification	Provides physical/coercive power

The colonial system therefore works through both ideas and institutions. It creates a distinction between “us” and “them” and then uses political and physical force to maintain that distinction.

---

Conclusion

Frantz Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth presents colonialism as a system that operates through political domination, economic exploitation, cultural discrimination, psychological oppression, and physical force.

His concept of Manichaeism helps us understand how colonial society is divided into opposing categories of colonizer and colonized. The colonizer represents themselves as civilized and superior while constructing the colonized as inferior and even as the embodiment of evil.

At the same time, Fanon's discussion of violence demonstrates that colonialism is not maintained only through ideas. It is supported by military, police, political, and economic structures of power. Consequently, decolonization becomes a fundamental struggle to dismantle the colonial order.

Fanon's analysis remains important to postcolonial studies because it shows that colonialism is not merely the occupation of territory. It is a system that attempts to control land, institutions, culture, identity, and the imagination of the colonized. His discussion of violence and Manichaeism therefore provides a powerful framework for understanding both the structure of colonial oppression and the psychological and political dimensions of resistance.

Key Takeaway

Manichaeism explains how colonialism divides humanity; violence explains how that unequal division is imposed and maintained.

Works Cited

Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Constance Farrington, Grove Press, 1963. Library Catalogue Record 

Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Richard Philcox, Grove Press, 2005. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Frantz Fanon 

Gordon, Lewis R. “Frantz Fanon.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 14 Mar. 2019. Frantz Fanon – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 

“Colonialism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University. Colonialism – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 